FAC timescales for Thames Valley?

New to the sport? Or just not sussed something out yet? Please ask your questions in here, there are many experienced shooters on the forum and someone will for sure come along and answer your question. This is a section for new shooters so if anyone can think of something please submit it.

Moderator: dromia

Message
Author
User avatar
GeeRam
Posts: 1160
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2015 9:58 pm
Home club or Range: PSC, Bisley
Location: Berks
Contact:

Re: FAC timescales for Thames Valley?

#21 Post by GeeRam »

G_C wrote: We haven't sent off the forms yet. We're currently probationary members of the NRA and will be shooting at Bisley. I believe you need to be a member of a club for a minimum of three months. If this time starts from initial probationary membership (11th Jan for us), not from when you receive the safe shooter certificate then given a six month delay I guess we could send them off now.
You need to ask the NRA, or the person you deal with when you go there about that.
Christel
Site Admin
Posts: 17375
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 7:52 pm
Location: Wind Swept Denmark
Contact:

Re: FAC timescales for Thames Valley?

#22 Post by Christel »

Don't ask for mirrored FACs, pain when one goes for a variation.

Ask for permission to keep eachother's firearms and ammo.

The wording is something like...

"Name" has permission to be in lawful possession of "name's" firearms.

Might have gotten that wrong lol

Anyway, ask for that, not mirrored.

If they say no...ask why not as other police forces are granting it. Beds/Lincs/Hampshire to name a few.
G_C
Posts: 24
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2017 3:04 pm

Re: FAC timescales for Thames Valley?

#23 Post by G_C »

christel wrote:Don't ask for mirrored FACs, pain when one goes for a variation.

Ask for permission to keep eachother's firearms and ammo.

The wording is something like...

"Name" has permission to be in lawful possession of "name's" firearms.

Might have gotten that wrong lol

Anyway, ask for that, not mirrored.

If they say no...ask why not as other police forces are granting it. Beds/Lincs/Hampshire to name a few.
That's interesting. I didn't see any mention of that in the Home Office guide on licensing law. Will have to take another look.
IainWR
Posts: 1409
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2011 12:43 pm
Home club or Range: NRA Bisley
Location: Bisley
Contact:

Re: FAC timescales for Thames Valley?

#24 Post by IainWR »

G_C wrote:
christel wrote:Don't ask for mirrored FACs, pain when one goes for a variation.

Ask for permission to keep eachother's firearms and ammo.

The wording is something like...

"Name" has permission to be in lawful possession of "name's" firearms.

Might have gotten that wrong lol

Anyway, ask for that, not mirrored.

If they say no...ask why not as other police forces are granting it. Beds/Lincs/Hampshire to name a few.
That's interesting. I didn't see any mention of that in the Home Office guide on licensing law. Will have to take another look.
Its not in the Guide, but it is completely legal, and as said, much easier than having the same guns on 2 FACs.
User avatar
kennyc
Posts: 2340
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:21 pm
Home club or Range: hunters NRPC
Location: Reading West Berks
Contact:

Re: FAC timescales for Thames Valley?

#25 Post by kennyc »

according to the Shooting Show, Thames Valley have called in BASC to help reduce the waiting time to 60 days, so it will be interesting to see what happens.
G_C
Posts: 24
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2017 3:04 pm

Re: FAC timescales for Thames Valley?

#26 Post by G_C »

kennyc wrote:according to the Shooting Show, Thames Valley have called in BASC to help reduce the waiting time to 60 days, so it will be interesting to see what happens.
That's positive news. I wonder how long it will take to work through the backlog (rhetorical question). We'll likely be applying in May. 60 days is still long but doesn't seem ridiculous.
User avatar
meles meles
Site Supporter Since 2020
Posts: 6333
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 8:17 pm
Home club or Range: HBSA
Location: Underground
Contact:

Re: FAC timescales for Thames Valley?

#27 Post by meles meles »

60 days is ridiculous.

You are paying for a service but not receiving it. As the service is there for the public good, not for your benefit, you shouldn't even need to pay for it.

The DVLA can keep track of 33 million drivers and 17 million private cars, issue a licence in under 10 working days and also cope with sending out taxation reminders, speeding fines and so forth at the same time.

The technical capability exists, the reason ("public good') exists, so why is the service so poor ?
Badger
CEO (Chief Excavatin' Officer)
Badger Korporashun



Quidquid latine dictum sit altum viditur.
"Quelle style, so British"
User avatar
kennyc
Posts: 2340
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:21 pm
Home club or Range: hunters NRPC
Location: Reading West Berks
Contact:

Re: FAC timescales for Thames Valley?

#28 Post by kennyc »

meles meles wrote:60 days is ridiculous.

You are paying for a service but not receiving it. As the service is there for the public good, not for your benefit, you shouldn't even need to pay for it.

The DVLA can keep track of 33 million drivers and 17 million private cars, issue a licence in under 10 working days and also cope with sending out taxation reminders, speeding fines and so forth at the same time.

The technical capability exists, the reason ("public good') exists, so why is the service so poor ?
60 days is around 300 less than they are currently taking ! so as an improvement its not too shabby, IF they can manage to attain it fingerscrossed
G_C
Posts: 24
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2017 3:04 pm

Re: FAC timescales for Thames Valley?

#29 Post by G_C »

meles meles wrote:60 days is ridiculous.

You are paying for a service but not receiving it. As the service is there for the public good, not for your benefit, you shouldn't even need to pay for it.

The DVLA can keep track of 33 million drivers and 17 million private cars, issue a licence in under 10 working days and also cope with sending out taxation reminders, speeding fines and so forth at the same time.

The technical capability exists, the reason ("public good') exists, so why is the service so poor ?
I understand the point you're making but don't think the comparison really holds true. DVLA isn't staffed or run by the police and neither is the granting of driving licences. Registration of cars doesn't require a home visit by the police nor the need to check two independent references or a GP comment (for most people).

In an ideal world I'd agree that 60 is too long but pragmatically, as kennyc says, 60 days from the current 180-360 is a vast improvement.
User avatar
shugie
Past Supporter
Posts: 1602
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2012 3:42 pm
Home club or Range: Sperry at Bisley
Location: near Reading
Contact:

Re: FAC timescales for Thames Valley?

#30 Post by shugie »

kennyc wrote:according to the Shooting Show, Thames Valley have called in BASC to help reduce the waiting time to 60 days, so it will be interesting to see what happens.
What can BASC do to help them I wonder?
Careful now/that sort of thing
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests