Vulcan Bomber XH558

Somewhere to share your tales, anecdotes and memories from past days.

Moderator: dromia

Forum rules
Please remember to respect the copyright of the author. Please do not post content from this section elsewhere without the specific permission of the author.
Message
Author
Harrier1980

Re: Vulcan Bomber XH558

#21 Post by Harrier1980 »

Burner wrote:
No it didn't, I saw with my own eyes
Dont you hate it when you see written history and you know it is not so, because you were there when it happened, or didnt happen.
Thanks for putting me right, Just found this, quite an interesting read.

http://www.sharkeysworld.com/2012/03/bl ... atter.html
Harrier1980

Re: Vulcan Bomber XH558

#22 Post by Harrier1980 »

christel wrote:
Titanic was an American ship, wasn't it?
;)
didn't the US capture the first Enigma machine too?
User avatar
Chuck
Posts: 23697
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2010 11:23 am
Location: Planet Earth - Mainly
Contact:

Re: Vulcan Bomber XH558

#23 Post by Chuck »

didn't the US capture the first Enigma machine too?
according to the movie they did...
Political Correctness is the language of lies, written by the corrupt , spoken by the inept!
User avatar
Blu
Posts: 5095
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 2:27 am
Location: N.W. Michigan

Re: Vulcan Bomber XH558

#24 Post by Blu »

didn't the US capture the first Enigma machine too?
Oh Jeez don't get me started on that one. You wouldn't believe the number of times I had to prove it was fiction.

Blu :twisted:
User avatar
John25
Posts: 2077
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 9:44 am
Location: Plymouth
Contact:

Re: Vulcan Bomber XH558

#25 Post by John25 »

Blu wrote:
didn't the US capture the first Enigma machine too?
Oh Jeez don't get me started on that one. You wouldn't believe the number of times I had to prove it was fiction.

Blu :twisted:


Is it?


:twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :flag5:
Gun rhymes with fun.

We are constrained only by the rules of safety and our own imagination.


John


http://www.bisleyshootingservices.co.uk
User avatar
Blu
Posts: 5095
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 2:27 am
Location: N.W. Michigan

Re: Vulcan Bomber XH558

#26 Post by Blu »

Harrier, yep a very interesting read, sure there were bomb and shell craters around the area of the runway from both the Vulcan raids and from naval gunfire, but as I said the runway itself wasn't touched and we/I saw no visible signs of repairs to the runway. Lets face it had they had to fill in a bomb crater it's not something one could miss, the repair would have been quit evident.

Blu :twisted:
User avatar
Blu
Posts: 5095
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 2:27 am
Location: N.W. Michigan

Re: Vulcan Bomber XH558

#27 Post by Blu »

John25 wrote:
Blu wrote:
didn't the US capture the first Enigma machine too?
Oh Jeez don't get me started on that one. You wouldn't believe the number of times I had to prove it was fiction.

Blu :twisted:


Is it?


:twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :flag5:
Is it what?

Blu :twisted:
User avatar
Sandgroper
Posts: 4735
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 3:45 pm
Location: Stanley, Falkland Islands
Contact:

Re: Vulcan Bomber XH558

#28 Post by Sandgroper »

Not meaning to put the cat amongst the pigeons or doubt Blu in any way but according to this picture, Blackbuck 1 hit the target.

Image

http://www.rna-10-area.net/blackbuck.html

This one shows the runway was missed, but looking at the picture it is probably Black Buck 2 (see below. You can already see the runway has been repaired (but the miss craters are still visible.)

Image

http://rafmuseum-1.titaninternet.co.uk/ ... y/1982.cfm

BB1 Target - Airfield runway
BB2 Target - Western end of runway to prevent enlargement
BB3 Scrubbed
BB4 Scrubbed
BB5 Target - Ground Radar array (Shrike missiles)
BB6 Target - AA Fire control radar (Shrike missiles)
BB7 Target - Troop positions near runway.
“The standard you walk past is the standard you accept.”

Lieutenant General David Morrison

I plink, therefore I shoot.
User avatar
Blu
Posts: 5095
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 2:27 am
Location: N.W. Michigan

Re: Vulcan Bomber XH558

#29 Post by Blu »

Sandgroper, hey that's the way it looks mate in the photos but I know what I saw. Could be the photos were doctored for the news and general public consumption (propaganda)? Hell I don't know, I just know what I saw and it doesn't tally with what was put out by the UK government at the time.

Blu :twisted:
User avatar
Sandgroper
Posts: 4735
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 3:45 pm
Location: Stanley, Falkland Islands
Contact:

Re: Vulcan Bomber XH558

#30 Post by Sandgroper »

Not disagreeing with you Blu, you where there and I was still in primary school!

If we make the assumption it was hit, then it was with only one bomb and relatively early in the war (30th April?) - that makes it quite possible that it was quite well repaired by the time you got there. If you look at the two pictures, the craters near the runway match (apart from the one in the middle of the runway).

However, you where there, which makes anything I say pure speculation!
“The standard you walk past is the standard you accept.”

Lieutenant General David Morrison

I plink, therefore I shoot.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests