Loads below published velocities?

This section is for reloading and ammunition only, all loads found in here are used strictly at your own risk, if in doubt ask again.
All handloading data posted on Full-Bore UK from 23/2/2021 must reference the published pressure tested data it was sourced from, posts without such verification will be removed.
Any existing data without such a reference should treated as suspect and not used.

Moderator: dromia

Forum rules
All handloading data posted on Full-Bore UK from 23/2/2021 must reference the published pressure tested data it was sourced from, posts without such verification will be removed.
Any existing data without such a reference should be treated as suspect and not used.

Use reloading information posted here at your own risk. This forum (http://www.full-bore.co.uk) is not responsible for any property damage or personal injury as a consequence of using reloading data posted here, the information is individual members findings and observations only. Always verify the load data and be absolutely sure your firearm can handle the load, especially older ones. If in doubt start low and work your way up.
Message
Author
Daryll
Past Supporter
Posts: 1043
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2014 9:07 am
Home club or Range: Isle Target Sports Club
Location: Cambridgeshire
Contact:

Loads below published velocities?

#1 Post by Daryll »

I've been doing some load development for my new Mossberg MVP Varmint in .223, with 24'' barrel.

Using GGG Brass, Sierra 69gn Matchkings, CCi 400 primers and Ramshot TAC powder I found the most accurate load was 23.6gn of TAC.

The Ramshot data for TAC with that bullet is min 21.9gn @ 2671fps, upto 24.3gn @ 2921fps, again, with a 24'' barrel.

Last weekend I borrowed the club Chrono and tried 10 shots of the 23.6 gn load and 5 shots of the next most accurate load, 24.2gn.

The 23.6 load averaged 2650, the 24.2gn load averaged about 2750..... so about 150-200fps below the published data.

So what would cause that..? I can understand how variances in loading could increase pressures, and velocities, but why are they low..?

TIA

Daryll.
User avatar
dromia
Site Admin
Posts: 19964
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 4:57 am
Home club or Range: The Highlands of Scotland. Cycling Proficiency 1964. Felton & District rifle club. Teesdale Pistol and Rifle club.
Location: Sutherland and Co Durham
Contact:

Re: Loads below published velocities?

#2 Post by dromia »

No two guns. pressure barrels, loads, conditions are exactly the same.

Was the OAL the same as the test loads?

Variance from actual to published is usual.
Image

Come on Bambi get some

Imperial Good Metric Bad
Analogue Good Digital Bad

Fecking stones

Real farmers don't need subsidies

Cow's farts matter!

For fine firearms and requisites visit

http://www.pukkabundhooks.com/
Daryll
Past Supporter
Posts: 1043
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2014 9:07 am
Home club or Range: Isle Target Sports Club
Location: Cambridgeshire
Contact:

Re: Loads below published velocities?

#3 Post by Daryll »

Yes, seated to 2.260, as per the data.

So can I safely increase the loads to get the required velocity..? I'm hoping these loads will be good out to 600 yds, so i'd like a decent speed...
User avatar
dromia
Site Admin
Posts: 19964
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 4:57 am
Home club or Range: The Highlands of Scotland. Cycling Proficiency 1964. Felton & District rifle club. Teesdale Pistol and Rifle club.
Location: Sutherland and Co Durham
Contact:

Re: Loads below published velocities?

#4 Post by dromia »

I would not increase the loads beyond the published maximum unless you have access to a way of pressure testing your rounds.

Velocity is not pressure, it is used as a proxy sometimes but it is a poor one especially if you are exceeding published data.

It is pressure that blows up guns not velocity.
Image

Come on Bambi get some

Imperial Good Metric Bad
Analogue Good Digital Bad

Fecking stones

Real farmers don't need subsidies

Cow's farts matter!

For fine firearms and requisites visit

http://www.pukkabundhooks.com/
Daryll
Past Supporter
Posts: 1043
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2014 9:07 am
Home club or Range: Isle Target Sports Club
Location: Cambridgeshire
Contact:

Re: Loads below published velocities?

#5 Post by Daryll »

Ok, thanks Dromia,

I could go a bit higher, as the rifle is chambered in 5.56, which Ramshot give higher loads for (22.9 to 25.4gn), so i could go a grain or 2 higher... but 23.6 is very accurate, so i won't mess with it.

Daryll.
User avatar
kennyc
Posts: 2340
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:21 pm
Home club or Range: hunters NRPC
Location: Reading West Berks
Contact:

Re: Loads below published velocities?

#6 Post by kennyc »

Daryll wrote:Ok, thanks Dromia,

I could go a bit higher, as the rifle is chambered in 5.56, which Ramshot give higher loads for (22.9 to 25.4gn), so i could go a grain or 2 higher... but 23.6 is very accurate, so i won't mess with it.

Daryll.
for target use accuracy is everything, even velocity isn't as big a deal (assuming you have enough umph to get to the target and give you the accuracy)no need to chase the last 100fps unless its effecting your accuracy, and a blown up action rarely wins matches :p
don't get dragged down the road of chasing extremely high speed, and always look at the test barrel length on the printed load data, its often several inches longer than you are expecting, and of course as Dromia has pointed out there are lots of enviromental differences to consider (including constructive interpretation of the results to give that market leading velocity teanews )
User avatar
channel12
Posts: 974
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2013 11:30 pm
Home club or Range: WNSC
Location: Worcestershire
Contact:

Re: Loads below published velocities?

#7 Post by channel12 »

Don't forget that temperature will affect velocity. If you chronographed your rounds in cold weather and the test data was done in an American summer there will be a difference in recoreded velocities
Daryll
Past Supporter
Posts: 1043
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2014 9:07 am
Home club or Range: Isle Target Sports Club
Location: Cambridgeshire
Contact:

Re: Loads below published velocities?

#8 Post by Daryll »

Thanks for the comments Gents.... I'm not that fussed about the velocity, as Kenny said, as long as they reach and penetrate the target accurately!!

But I was curious why my velocities are so low.... I've looked at some commercial .223 ammo, and they're all quoting 2800 - 2900fps for a 69gn bullet.. which should be about the same for the TAC loads..
I could understand some variance... 50-100 fps... but nearly 200 fps?? And my MVP is the same barrel length as the quoted loads..

Stange... maybe I'll buy some factory ammo with a quoted MV, and chrono that with mine ammo...
rox
Posts: 1895
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 1:33 pm
Contact:

Re: Loads below published velocities?

#9 Post by rox »

Daryll wrote:I could understand some variance... 50-100 fps... but nearly 200 fps?? And my MVP is the same barrel length as the quoted loads..
Bore/Groove dimensions?
User avatar
Mattnall
Site Supporter Since 2016
Posts: 2858
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2013 5:32 pm
Home club or Range: Harlow TAC, NRA, BSRC
Contact:

Re: Loads below published velocities?

#10 Post by Mattnall »

People often get too fussy about velocity.

If you didn't use the chrono you would have been happy with your rounds and their accuracy, blissfully ignorant of their leisurely stroll down range.

Now you're worrying about something that didn't matter before.

Unless you need to go further and faster, let it go.
Arming the Country, one gun at a time.

Good deals with Paul101, Charlotte the flyer, majordisorder, Charlie Muggins, among others. Thanks everybody.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 7 guests