Hornady 178 vs 180.

This section is for reloading and ammunition only, all loads found in here are used strictly at your own risk, if in doubt ask again.
All handloading data posted on Full-Bore UK from 23/2/2021 must reference the published pressure tested data it was sourced from, posts without such verification will be removed.
Any existing data without such a reference should treated as suspect and not used.

Moderator: dromia

Forum rules
All handloading data posted on Full-Bore UK from 23/2/2021 must reference the published pressure tested data it was sourced from, posts without such verification will be removed.
Any existing data without such a reference should be treated as suspect and not used.

Use reloading information posted here at your own risk. This forum (http://www.full-bore.co.uk) is not responsible for any property damage or personal injury as a consequence of using reloading data posted here, the information is individual members findings and observations only. Always verify the load data and be absolutely sure your firearm can handle the load, especially older ones. If in doubt start low and work your way up.
Post Reply
Message
Author
ruger_steve
Posts: 55
Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2018 1:42 am
Home club or Range: Bisley
Contact:

Hornady 178 vs 180.

#1 Post by ruger_steve »

Hi all.

So I have asked this before but then I left it alone because of this whole pandemic. Now it's getting to the time where I was to start making up some rounds again.

I have 200x Hornady 178gr HPBT Match (30715) bullets

On Hornady reloading tables they list several bullets into a group, and then give a group reloading dataset. Within this group is also the 180gr Interlock SP (3070).

Now the reloading data here does not list Vihtavuori N140 which unfortunately I bought 1kg bottle of the same day not knowing that Hornady don't list it. I contacted them and they just said that V didn't work for them. wtf

On my Vihtavuori loading guide, it doesn't have the 178gr bullets, but it does have the load data for the 180gr SP's using N140.

My question is, if Hornady are saying that all of these bullets in the group effectively work the same with that one set of data, with the powders listed, then would that carry across to Vihtavuori also?

I just don't want to waste this N140 and/or have to buy a different powder which I will have to wait till they reopen if I can help it. Many thanks.


Image
Image
User avatar
Ovenpaa
Site Supporter Since 2015
Posts: 24680
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 8:27 pm
Location: Årbjerg, Morsø DK
Contact:

Re: Hornady 178 vs 180.

#2 Post by Ovenpaa »

N140 is probably a bit quick for a 178/180 grain projectile. I would not necessarily lump all 178/180 grain projectiles together either as some are flat based, some boat tailed and this may give longer bearing surfaces and accordingly different pressures. Hopefully Laurie Holland will be along in a bit and give you a definitive answer.
/d

Du lytter aldrig til de ord jeg siger. Du ser mig kun for det tøj jeg har paa ...

Shed Journal
ruger_steve
Posts: 55
Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2018 1:42 am
Home club or Range: Bisley
Contact:

Re: Hornady 178 vs 180.

#3 Post by ruger_steve »

Ovenpaa wrote:N140 is probably a bit quick for a 178/180 grain projectile. I would not necessaries lump all 178/180 grain projectiles together either as some are flat based, some boat tailed and this may give longer bearing surfaces and accordingly different pressures. Hopefully Laurie Holland will be along in a bit and give you a definitive answer.
Hi mate. Thank you very much for your reply. Hope you are keeping safe in this crazy world at the moment. Yes I didn’t think it was particularly amazing Hornady to just a lump about 10 different bullets of different sizes weights and shapes with the same load data. Very odd. (Not that I know a great deal about it.)

The dilemma I’ve got is I’ve got £80 worth of powder, but don’t know whether to just go and buy some reloader 17 which they do list data for. But then again, it’s going to be the data that’s used for ALL of them. And it’s the only place I can find that particular bullet with data. So frustrating


Sent from my boing using "An application"
User avatar
kennyc
Posts: 2340
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:21 pm
Home club or Range: hunters NRPC
Location: Reading West Berks
Contact:

Re: Hornady 178 vs 180.

#4 Post by kennyc »

just to accentuate what Ovenpaa said, even if they lump them together best to start low and work up, as an example I loaded up some 180 softpoints for pigs in .308, I started low by the book as I needed them in a short time not after an extended series of tests, after zeroing typically I didn't get to use them as the pigs all went to my mates area troutslapping
anyway a couple of months later I had the opportunity to chrono those loads, they were doing 2600fps from a 20" barrel! this was with a near starting load of N140! no hard extract, no extractor wipe and no excessive primer flattening compared to my normal target or hunting loads! so always work up a load. having said that the N140 obviously worked for that load.
RL17 is now RS60 by the way
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 12 guests