Lee vs Hornady

This section is for reloading and ammunition only, all loads found in here are used strictly at your own risk, if in doubt ask again.
All handloading data posted on Full-Bore UK from 23/2/2021 must reference the published pressure tested data it was sourced from, posts without such verification will be removed.
Any existing data without such a reference should treated as suspect and not used.

Moderator: dromia

Forum rules
All handloading data posted on Full-Bore UK from 23/2/2021 must reference the published pressure tested data it was sourced from, posts without such verification will be removed.
Any existing data without such a reference should be treated as suspect and not used.

Use reloading information posted here at your own risk. This forum (http://www.full-bore.co.uk) is not responsible for any property damage or personal injury as a consequence of using reloading data posted here, the information is individual members findings and observations only. Always verify the load data and be absolutely sure your firearm can handle the load, especially older ones. If in doubt start low and work your way up.
Post Reply
Message
Author
makarova
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue May 26, 2020 8:44 am

Lee vs Hornady

#1 Post by makarova »

Another question from the new kid... shakeshout
When it comes to reloading (.308) is there any major advantage of paying the extra for the Hornady press equipment?
If I were to stick with Lee is there a limited life time before I have to replace major parts?
Let’s say if I were reloading 50/100 rounds per week (yes this is a broad amount).
Any experienced loaders with any advice is much appreciated.

Thanks
User avatar
Ovenpaa
Site Supporter Since 2015
Posts: 24680
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 8:27 pm
Location: Årbjerg, Morsø DK
Contact:

Re: Lee vs Hornady

#2 Post by Ovenpaa »

I purchased a Lee Cast Classic as my first ever reloading press, it was not what I wanted and I took it only because I needed a press and knew I would replace it within a few months. I still use it to this day and it is my go to press for so many reasons. There are lots of things I have replaced along the way however the Cast Classic will always stop with me.
/d

Du lytter aldrig til de ord jeg siger. Du ser mig kun for det tøj jeg har paa ...

Shed Journal
DaveT
Posts: 416
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 8:31 pm
Location: South Cerney, Gloucestershire

Re: Lee vs Hornady

#3 Post by DaveT »

You are not going to wear out either press in a typical reloading lifetime.
It's more a question of which you find easiest to use and is better built and more likely to turn out a concentric round.
Try to get hands-on and check out specific presses for sloppy linkages.

In my view the Hornady is better than the Lee (you will hear contrary opinions) but neither are in the same league as a Forster co-ax....... neither do they cost as much.
Buy the best you can afford but try them first.
User avatar
Alpha1
Site Supporter Since 2020
Posts: 8556
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2010 8:27 pm
Contact:

Re: Lee vs Hornady

#4 Post by Alpha1 »

Except for some Lee dies a handheld press. Oh and a couple of the old handheld primers I dont own any Lee equipment I have done over the years but rapidly got rid of it. The Lee cast press gets good reviews but I wouldn't know having never owned one. I am not a fan of Lee reloading equipment. If you can afford it my advice would be to avoid Lee gear and go for the Hornady or RCBS or Lyman.
I have whittled my reloading gear down to the bare minimum The bulk of my handloading is done on a Wamadet press or an Arbor press or a mixture of both. I also have a Lyman crusher that gets occasional use.

If you are new to reloading I suggest you have a look at the Lee Loaders you can reload a single round with nothing but a soft-faced hammer and the dies. They are fun things to play with and a great way to learn.
https://www.henrykrank.com/reloading/le ... oader.html
User avatar
bradaz11
Sporadic Site Supporter
Posts: 4722
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2014 1:23 am
Home club or Range: The tunnel at Charmouth, BWSS
Location: Bristol
Contact:

Re: Lee vs Hornady

#5 Post by bradaz11 »

nothing wrong with lee kit for normal use ammo. it's budget gear that produces perfectly usuable ammo.
except for their scales, throw those in the bin, and buy just about any other make of beam scale.
When guns are outlawed, only Outlaws will have guns
The Gun Pimp
Posts: 1154
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 3:08 pm
Contact:

Re: Lee vs Hornady

#6 Post by The Gun Pimp »

makarova wrote:Another question from the new kid... shakeshout
When it comes to reloading (.308) is there any major advantage of paying the extra for the Hornady press equipment?
If I were to stick with Lee is there a limited life time before I have to replace major parts?
Let’s say if I were reloading 50/100 rounds per week (yes this is a broad amount).
Any experienced loaders with any advice is much appreciated.

Thanks
Lee stuff is usable but 'budget'. However, the Cast Classic press is quite good and good value. If you are in this for the long haul - buy the best you can afford and cry once.
FredB
Site Supporter Since 2019
Posts: 969
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 8:33 pm
Home club or Range: stourport
Location: Wolverhampton
Contact:

Re: Lee vs Hornady

#7 Post by FredB »

I bought a Lee 3-hole turret press when they came out in the 1980s. It is still going strong after tens of thousands of rounds. I also have an RCBS and have owned Lyman and Wadamet presses over the years. If there is a general difference in quality, I have yet to find it. I can, as a retired mechanical engineer, analyse each product and find strengths and weaknesses in both design and manufacture. If I was starting out again, I would buy Lee equipment again but, if I was into benchrest accuracy with high velocity rifles, I would probably go for the more specialist low volume equipment.
Fred
User avatar
Mattnall
Site Supporter Since 2016
Posts: 2861
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2013 5:32 pm
Home club or Range: Harlow TAC, NRA, BSRC
Contact:

Re: Lee vs Hornady

#8 Post by Mattnall »

Like Fred, I bought a Lee 3-hole turret in the late '80s. This is still sitting on the reloading bench waiting for the next batch of loading. I use it mainly to load pistol calibre rounds and the few cartridges that only get minimal range time and I can't be bothered to alter the Dillons to suit their case head.

The turret press can load pistol calibres very quickly and gives great results and to change cartridge size is very simple, but some of the larger cartridges are a bit more tricky. The .303 and .30-30 need the press converted to a single stage but still works fine for the smaller numbers I make.
Arming the Country, one gun at a time.

Good deals with Paul101, Charlotte the flyer, majordisorder, Charlie Muggins, among others. Thanks everybody.
ukrifleman
Past Supporter
Posts: 728
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2012 7:26 pm
Contact:

Re: Lee vs Hornady

#9 Post by ukrifleman »

I use a Lee classic cast 4 hole turret press, they are solidly built, excellent value and will give years of reliable service.

I load 17 calibres with mine from 30-06 to 44-40 with no issues, plus swapping calibres takes only seconds once die sets are installed in their own turrets.

My beam scale of choice is a Redding No.2, although I also have a Lyman and a Lee.

My Lee powder scale is as accurate as the Lyman and Redding, but is more fiddly to set up and it only weighs up to 100 grains, no good if you want to weigh bullets as well.

The other bone of contention is that they have poor beam damping which gets frustrating after a while.

Lee kit is good value for the most part and will produce good serviceable ammunition if used correctly.

ukrifleman
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests