In this section because...NWS

All things Hunting, Fishing, Wildlife and Conservation related.

Moderator: dromia

Forum rules
"The Dromia Rule"

Deer Stalking… reliable word of mouth recommendation from someone you know has undertaken such stalking being offered by a specific syndicate is best. Like other walks of life, stalking has its scammers. E.G., make sure there is deer, of the species sought, on the land being made available; that appropriate insurance is in place; that there is recourse for recompense if it all goes wrong. In addition, obtain and understand terms and conditions; consider the implications of allowing a syndicate leader to be a FAC mentor; make sure ‘coaches’ are suitably qualified; consider the quality of deer management, the construction & execution of a shooting plan and safety; determine if the land is over-shot.

If in doubt, contact BASC or similar.

http://www.basc.org.uk/

Anyone considered to be a scammer will be banned without warning.
Message
Author
User avatar
meles meles
Site Supporter Since 2020
Posts: 6333
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 8:17 pm
Home club or Range: HBSA
Location: Underground
Contact:

Re: In this section because...NWS

#11 Post by meles meles »

Stocks, ooman ?

No.

They were reserved, on the whole, for crimes against property and minor misdemeanours.

They had the birch and whipping for this sort of crime.
Badger
CEO (Chief Excavatin' Officer)
Badger Korporashun



Quidquid latine dictum sit altum viditur.
"Quelle style, so British"
User avatar
raybrown53
Posts: 366
Joined: Wed May 23, 2012 6:43 am
Home club or Range: Corinium Rifle Range / WNSC
Location: North Wiltshire

Re: In this section because...NWS

#12 Post by raybrown53 »

meles meles wrote:Stocks, ooman ?

No.

They were reserved, on the whole, for crimes against property and minor misdemeanours.

They had the birch and whipping for this sort of crime.

Ok but start with the stocks and increase the punishment, humiliate the offenders etc
When in doubt C4
Dougan
Posts: 4187
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 8:20 pm

Re: In this section because...NWS

#13 Post by Dougan »

raybrown53 wrote:
christel wrote:...I think someone ought to hunt this low life scum down and give him the same treatment as he gave his "best friend".

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... stick.html

It is not for the faint hearted nor is it work safe.

...suspended sentence...joke ****

This society is wrong wrong wrong when we have "people" who do this and a law system that lets them get away with it.

Clamp down hard on cases like this, make people pass a test before they are allowed to "own" a pet or have a kid. I do not accept that human rights play a part in kids/pets "ownership". It is something that ought to be earned.

If anyone out there reading this experience something similar, or is stupid enough to record it instead of intervene, please please intervene!
I find it really hard to read articles like this. it makes my blood boil.
Same here ****
Dougan
Posts: 4187
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 8:20 pm

Re: In this section because...NWS

#14 Post by Dougan »

I read this week that the MOD has put down 288 serving dogs in the last 4 years - Apparently 19 were put down due to their temperament (which I can sort of see), but the majority had simply come to end of their useful career :bad:

Christ we have donkey sanctuaries, surely it can't be that expensive to have a retirement home for ex-military dogs?

Two of the ones recently put down had been extras used to guard Prince William, but when he left the barracks they were euthanised - maybe the royal family could contribute to a sanctuary...or is feeding the corgis with sirloin steak affecting their finances?
User avatar
meles meles
Site Supporter Since 2020
Posts: 6333
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 8:17 pm
Home club or Range: HBSA
Location: Underground
Contact:

Re: In this section because...NWS

#15 Post by meles meles »

From our experience, squirrel, most military attack dogs are only really only obedient when handled by a very small number of trainers they have been taught to obey. You wouldn't want them to "sit" when the bad guy shouted "sit", would you and so their training reflects that. Sadly, it does make them a little unsuitable for re-homing after service. Would you trust one around your kiddiwinks?
Badger
CEO (Chief Excavatin' Officer)
Badger Korporashun



Quidquid latine dictum sit altum viditur.
"Quelle style, so British"
Dougan
Posts: 4187
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 8:20 pm

Re: In this section because...NWS

#16 Post by Dougan »

I do understand that badger - It looked like they did manage to re-home more than 300, and as you suggest they were the smaller dogs (like spaniels used for sniffing etc.) not the guard dogs; and no I wouldn't want an ex-military guard dog...

...but how expensive would it be to provide 200/300 dogs with reasonable living conditions for their retirement?...It just strikes me that it's yet another example where the simplest and most cost-effective solution is to kill an animal, rather than do the right thing...
User avatar
meles meles
Site Supporter Since 2020
Posts: 6333
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 8:17 pm
Home club or Range: HBSA
Location: Underground
Contact:

Re: In this section because...NWS

#17 Post by meles meles »

Oh, like The Cull you mean ?
Badger
CEO (Chief Excavatin' Officer)
Badger Korporashun



Quidquid latine dictum sit altum viditur.
"Quelle style, so British"
Dougan
Posts: 4187
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 8:20 pm

Re: In this section because...NWS

#18 Post by Dougan »

The cull is a prime and even more disgusting example!
User avatar
Chuck
Posts: 23666
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2010 11:23 am
Location: Planet Earth - Mainly
Contact:

Re: In this section because...NWS

#19 Post by Chuck »

So, any ideas on what's the best way to organise retribution without being caught then?????????? tesnews

I have zero tolerance for cretins who ill treat animals, they should be bullwhipped and castrated with a blunt teaspoon.
Political Correctness is the language of lies, written by the corrupt , spoken by the inept!
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests