Badger cull to go ahead

All things Hunting, Fishing, Wildlife and Conservation related.

Moderator: dromia

Forum rules
"The Dromia Rule"

Deer Stalking… reliable word of mouth recommendation from someone you know has undertaken such stalking being offered by a specific syndicate is best. Like other walks of life, stalking has its scammers. E.G., make sure there is deer, of the species sought, on the land being made available; that appropriate insurance is in place; that there is recourse for recompense if it all goes wrong. In addition, obtain and understand terms and conditions; consider the implications of allowing a syndicate leader to be a FAC mentor; make sure ‘coaches’ are suitably qualified; consider the quality of deer management, the construction & execution of a shooting plan and safety; determine if the land is over-shot.

If in doubt, contact BASC or similar.

http://www.basc.org.uk/

Anyone considered to be a scammer will be banned without warning.
Message
Author
User avatar
Jenks
Posts: 5949
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 5:07 pm

Re: Badger cull to go ahead

#141 Post by Jenks »

christel wrote:
Sandgroper wrote: Just as an aside - as badgers are omnivores http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/a ... ood_habits and take a wide variety of foods including small mammals, birds, amphibians, fruit and cereal crops - wouldn't an unchecked and increasing population have an adverse impact on all the prey species they feed on? As well as potentially causing them to come into conflict with fruit and cereal crop growers - with an increased call to control them?

Would it not be better then to maintain badger levels at a sustainable levels, thus preventing overpopulation and increased pressure on the badgers natural prey? It would maintain the health of the badger population due a decrease in stressors - overpopulation, competition for food and disease etc. Then you would have healthier population of badgers and the argument regarding the cause and spread of bTB would fall back on the farming practises because the badger population is smaller and healthier and therefore not at fault?
You have a point, which is why mankind is managing the environment to the best of their knowledge. Culling deer is necessary not only for their own sake but also for the surroundings where they live. I am not against culling badgers, they have no natural enemies, only thing I can think of are cars :twisted:
I think, having no evidence whatsoever, that culling badgers will benefit the local wildlife and also the badgers.
However culling badgers to get rid of TB...no, that does not make sense.
Christel..
However culling badgers to get rid of TB...no, that does not make sense.
With respect I don't think that is the object of the proposed cull. If it is it will surely fail. As I understand it, and I'm sure that if I am wrong Dougan will correct me. The cull is to gauge the effect of removing a specific number of badgers (I believe it is 70%) from a given area on the incidence of bTB in cattle in the controlled cull area. That still leaves 30% some of which are bound to be infected with bTB. As I have already said. I would prefer to go much further and cull all badgers in the cull areas, and keep them badger free for a specified number of years. That should provide much more accurate data regarding the spread of the disease by badgers.


Jenks
User avatar
Sandgroper
Site Supporter Since 2015
Posts: 4733
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 3:45 pm
Location: Stanley, Falkland Islands
Contact:

Re: Badger cull to go ahead

#142 Post by Sandgroper »

Dougan wrote: I don't want to upsett meles meles, but I know what you mean, and I have said that 'sustainable harvesting' would not be wrong - The problem is that people have never been sensible or reasonable where badgers are concerned...instead of taking the odd one for the pot, or controlling a few problem animals, there has been a tendency to take out the whole sett...and often by very inhumane methods - which is why they ended up protected....

....but I still disagree with 'culling' in any circumstances...
So if we changed it from 'culling' to 'sustainable harvesting' or 'population management' with appropriate controls and methods in place, you wouldn't have a problem with it?

Off topic but what about eradicating an alien introduced species to protect a native one?
“The standard you walk past is the standard you accept.”

Lieutenant General David Morrison

I plink, therefore I shoot.
User avatar
meles meles
Site Supporter Since 2020
Posts: 6333
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 8:17 pm
Home club or Range: HBSA
Location: Underground
Contact:

Re: Badger cull to go ahead

#143 Post by meles meles »

Sandgroper wrote:
Off topic but what about eradicating an alien introduced species to protect a native one?
You're the aliens here, oomans !
Badger
CEO (Chief Excavatin' Officer)
Badger Korporashun



Quidquid latine dictum sit altum viditur.
"Quelle style, so British"
Dougan
Posts: 4187
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 8:20 pm

Re: Badger cull to go ahead

#144 Post by Dougan »

Dougan wrote:or do you only mistrust journalists when they write about Afghanistan, race or politics?
Sandgroper - I've just re-read this post and realised that that was an unfair comment to be directed at you - please accept my apology ( :oops: )...

...and allow me to re-direct that one out as a general comment...
User avatar
Sandgroper
Site Supporter Since 2015
Posts: 4733
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 3:45 pm
Location: Stanley, Falkland Islands
Contact:

Re: Badger cull to go ahead

#145 Post by Sandgroper »

meles meles wrote:
Sandgroper wrote:
Off topic but what about eradicating an alien introduced species to protect a native one?
You're the aliens here, oomans !
Since when? Go back far enough and we're all related in some way!
“The standard you walk past is the standard you accept.”

Lieutenant General David Morrison

I plink, therefore I shoot.
User avatar
Sandgroper
Site Supporter Since 2015
Posts: 4733
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 3:45 pm
Location: Stanley, Falkland Islands
Contact:

Re: Badger cull to go ahead

#146 Post by Sandgroper »

Dougan wrote:
Dougan wrote:or do you only mistrust journalists when they write about Afghanistan, race or politics?
Sandgroper - I've just re-read this post and realised that that was an unfair comment to be directed at you - please accept my apology ( :oops: )...

...and allow me to re-direct that one out as a general comment...
You had me totally confused for a moment - it's easily done! :oops:

No harm done and no insult taken. :good:
“The standard you walk past is the standard you accept.”

Lieutenant General David Morrison

I plink, therefore I shoot.
User avatar
Jenks
Posts: 5949
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 5:07 pm

Re: Badger cull to go ahead

#147 Post by Jenks »

meles meles wrote:
Sandgroper wrote:
Off topic but what about eradicating an alien introduced species to protect a native one?
You're the aliens here, oomans !

MM..

You're the aliens here, oomans
Ah! but we are the dominate species. For the time being that is. It might be a different story, if them that are in favour of lobbing Nuclear bombs around get their way............. Happen, it could then be the humble cockroach who is master of all he surveys. ;)


Jenks
Last edited by Jenks on Sat Oct 13, 2012 8:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Dougan
Posts: 4187
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 8:20 pm

Re: Badger cull to go ahead

#148 Post by Dougan »

Sandgroper wrote:
Dougan wrote: I don't want to upsett meles meles, but I know what you mean, and I have said that 'sustainable harvesting' would not be wrong - The problem is that people have never been sensible or reasonable where badgers are concerned...instead of taking the odd one for the pot, or controlling a few problem animals, there has been a tendency to take out the whole sett...and often by very inhumane methods - which is why they ended up protected....

....but I still disagree with 'culling' in any circumstances...
So if we changed it from 'culling' to 'sustainable harvesting' or 'population management' with appropriate controls and methods in place, you wouldn't have a problem with it?
I would prefer anything that isn't a 'program' of sorts...but could not necessarily judge a farmer that was overrun with badgers who shot a few that came too close to his farm....and lets face it, does anyone think that farmers havn't been shooting badgers?....there is a theory (that I can't substantiate) that many of the badger found dead on the road, weren't run over....

And sorry - I should have qualified what I said about culling - I am not against the culling of non-endemic species...but not the badger, who is one of our few large endemic mammals left...and the TB issue is not their fault...
User avatar
Sandgroper
Site Supporter Since 2015
Posts: 4733
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 3:45 pm
Location: Stanley, Falkland Islands
Contact:

Re: Badger cull to go ahead

#149 Post by Sandgroper »

Dougan wrote:I would prefer anything that isn't a 'program' of sorts...but could not necessarily judge a farmer that was overrun with badgers who shot a few that came too close to his farm....and lets face it, does anyone think that farmers havn't been shooting badgers?....there is a theory (that I can't substantiate) that many of the badger found dead on the road, weren't run over....
If it was a 'program' it could be monitored more closely and could actually provide the basis of an effective population management program as well as a more accurate number count. Perversely, it could also reduce badger baiting because the people doing the controlling would have a interest in preventing that sort of thing from happening.

Regarding that theory, you could collect the carcass and get a vet to determine cause of death - I believe that is what is required to make sporrans from badgers, proof that it was natural causes or something like being hit by a car before the carcass can be legally used.
“The standard you walk past is the standard you accept.”

Lieutenant General David Morrison

I plink, therefore I shoot.
Dougan
Posts: 4187
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 8:20 pm

Re: Badger cull to go ahead

#150 Post by Dougan »

Sandgroper wrote:
Dougan wrote:I would prefer anything that isn't a 'program' of sorts...but could not necessarily judge a farmer that was overrun with badgers who shot a few that came too close to his farm....and lets face it, does anyone think that farmers havn't been shooting badgers?....there is a theory (that I can't substantiate) that many of the badger found dead on the road, weren't run over....
If it was a 'program' it could be monitored more closely and could actually provide the basis of an effective population management program as well as a more accurate number count.
I'm sure we've talked about you talking sense before...and I don't approve :P

I just think that it's a problem of our own making, and it's totally unfair to cull 100 000 badgers as an 'easy' solution....


As for the road death theory - It wouldn't be difficult to remove a bullet, run the badger over a few times, and then chuck it in the road.....and who's going to bother asking for an autopsy?
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests