Mattnall wrote:
I guess it is a case of the new club really doesn't know who you are or what you are like. I have seen some iffy behaviour at some clubs and on one occasion was told 'that is so-and-so, he's like that, we keep an eye on him'. I didn't go back.
But he could have joined another club and potentially been given full membership and unsupervised time on the range in the mistaken belief that he was a safe and competent shooter.
A minimum period just to see if you are up to the standards most of us expect is not a bad thing.
This.
Hrun wrote:Rockhopper wrote:That sounds a bizarre set up. Are you saying they force you to have a go at every kind of shooting they offer even if you have no interest in that particular discipline? Whats the thinking behind that? How does that work legally with LBP as well?
We do, for all the disciplines there are club guns for.
The reason is simple.. once you are a full member you can use any range, so we have to know you are safe anywhere.
And This.
Nail on the head.
Just to add, as a full-club member you are then in a position where you can supervise new probationers, if you were not competent on all rifles in the armoury, how could you possibly supervise someone on a firearm you yourself are not conversant in.
We have some older members of our club, who are willing to help, but if it doesn't fall in the discipline that they have shot for the past 40 years, they haven't got a clue. Making sure everybody is conversant in all firearms available to members, even if they're not interested in the discipline, can only be a good thing. You may not be interested, but at least you'll be safe.