The UK's Finest Independent Forum for Shooters and Gun Owners. Est 2010.

Supporting all legal firearm owners, collectors, enthusiasts, shooters and competitors by promoting and encouraging legitimate gun ownership and use in the UK through unity, advocacy and discussion. To REGISTER contact admin(at)full-bore.co.uk
It is currently Wed Dec 11, 2019 7:16 am

All times are UTC


Forum rules


Should your post be in Grumpy Old Men? This area is for general shooting related posts only please.



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 73 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 8  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Nov 30, 2019 5:05 pm 
Offline
Site Supporter Since 2016
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2013 5:32 pm
Posts: 1967
Home club or Range: Harlow TAC, NRA, BSRC
Well, looking at the picture from the Daily Mail link above, the SA80 could be a DP, and the L96 has a deactivation certificate hanging in front of it, add the hint that the Browning was also deactivated and therefore not much in the way of firearms if that's the case - so the mandatory 5 years doesn't need to apply I would think.

_________________
Arming the Country, one gun at a time.

Good deals with Charlotte the flyer, majordisorder, Charlie Muggins, among others. Thanks everybody.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 02, 2019 12:36 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu May 16, 2019 9:40 am
Posts: 89
Home club or Range: Private range
Peters excellent publications and various fiream articles have been of huge assistance to many people over the years, myself included.

As ever, we only ever hear half truths regarding the trial, don't pay any attention to the utter toss that's printed in the papers too, journalistic sensationalism, to say the very least.

To sum this very sad affair up, I would just say, Peter is a decent man, who always helps anyone who asks, he made some bad decisions and he and his family are paying a very high price for those mistakes.

I wish him the very best and hope for an early release as possible.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 02, 2019 2:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2014 11:02 am
Posts: 2011
Home club or Range: NRA
Alan D wrote:
Peters excellent publications and various fiream articles have been of huge assistance to many people over the years, myself included.

As ever, we only ever hear half truths regarding the trial, don't pay any attention to the utter toss that's printed in the papers too, journalistic sensationalism, to say the very least.

To sum this very sad affair up, I would just say, Peter is a decent man, who always helps anyone who asks, he made some bad decisions and he and his family are paying a very high price for those mistakes.

I wish him the very best and hope for an early release as possible.


I second that. He gave me some sound advice when I was looking over a Lee Enfield back in the day when Dunmore Shooting Club in Oxfordshire was a thriving club. I still have my purchase. I believe it was Peter that handled my very first FAC application's inspection if memory serves.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 02, 2019 9:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 11:24 am
Posts: 1509
Hi Dark Skies, I recall you have a bit of legal understanding. Was this case tried under the double jeopardy laws being relaxed? I had previously understood that a jury had found in the defendants favour last year.

Is that the way things are going now, if the CPS don't like the result they just keep on lodging cases until they win?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 02, 2019 10:55 am 
Offline
Site Supporter Since 2016
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2013 5:32 pm
Posts: 1967
Home club or Range: Harlow TAC, NRA, BSRC
DL. wrote:
if the CPS don't like the result they just keep on lodging cases until they win?

It seems to be the way of things these days; don't like the result - cry and bitch about it until you get a result you like.

_________________
Arming the Country, one gun at a time.

Good deals with Charlotte the flyer, majordisorder, Charlie Muggins, among others. Thanks everybody.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 02, 2019 11:35 am 
Offline
Site Supporter Since 2018
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 9:09 pm
Posts: 9761
They were cleared of ten charges in the first trial and the jury was unable to reach a decision on some of the charges indicted, so were retried on those charges alone, of which they were found guilty.

Laidler stole whilst in a position of trust. He’s a thief. Smith handled some those items knowing, or believing them to be stolen.

And conversely I can’t say I’ve heard a good word about the man. I know he cost a member on here a large amount of money because he “decreed” a genuine rifle as a fake. I also have another friend who was not too complimentary about Mr Laidler neither.

And as a 72year old ex-copper, a three year sentence even in an Open Prison, is not going to be a pleasant time at all.

_________________
In 1978 I was told by my grand dad that the secret to rifle accuracy is, a quality bullet, fired down a quality barrel..... How has that changed?

Guns dont kill people. Dads with pretty Daughters do...!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 02, 2019 11:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2014 11:02 am
Posts: 2011
Home club or Range: NRA
DL. wrote:
Hi Dark Skies, I recall you have a bit of legal understanding. Was this case tried under the double jeopardy laws being relaxed? I had previously understood that a jury had found in the defendants favour last year.

Is that the way things are going now, if the CPS don't like the result they just keep on lodging cases until they win?


Sim has fielded this.
After the aquittals there remained four charges the jury couldn't reach verdicts on. They were then listed to be heard at Crown Court to determine whether there should be a retrial. Clearly they decided that there was enough going for the prosecution's case for there to be a viable second bite of the cherry and so it came to pass.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 1:33 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu May 16, 2019 9:40 am
Posts: 89
Home club or Range: Private range
You sound like you are enjoying Peters misery Sim.
Oh well, I guess some people just relish sticking in the boot when a man is down.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 8:12 am 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 7:52 pm
Posts: 15362
Location: The Lincolnshire Wolds
Home club or Range: North Cotes Butts, Grove Small Arms
Peter Laidler, arrogant as they come when asked for advise.

Roger Smith, nice bloke, met him once.

That aside, they committed the crime regardless of what the newspapers are writing, in my book that means they have to do the time.

I am not in the least bit sad on their behalf, they have done the shooting community no favours.

_________________
Non Binary - 71 gender options - are we talking replication limiting code?
Darwin would approve.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 9:08 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu May 16, 2019 9:40 am
Posts: 89
Home club or Range: Private range
Peter Laidler, arrogant as they come when asked for advise...

You take people as you find them I guess, I know of many People that Peter had gone above and beyond for to help and assist.

Arrogance, well he is a product of his service and to a lesser extent his generation.

It's important to remember that the culture of institutions such as the Small Arms Collection at Warminster are very different today than they were 20 years ago.

Some local interpretation of the rules by Peter (and superiors) that was retarded as fine then, brings a rabid response now, especially when certain individuals have an axe to grind!

It's difficult to retrospectively apply the rules (though legally of course they can and do).

The investigation was initially carried out by by MOD Plod, anyone who has had anything to do with this organisation will tell you two things.

A, they couldn't find their own arse with both hands....
B, they don't like loosing ... At any cost to the tax payer!

I can tell you that there are many individuals within the MOD (and other organisations) who exceeded their personal authority over the years and broke the rules of the day, should the Spanish inquisition desire to investigate them and retrospectively denounce them .... watch out.

People in glass houses best not throw stones shall we say....

I recall a particular small arms refresher coarse, some 25 years ago where a boozy lunch came before SMG range time .... Umm, now can I remember the names, let me think, best I call Mod Plod and the Daily Fail!

I recall a certain Prince who landed a certain MOD helicopter without permission to drop into Daddy's house for lunch, well sounds like a job for MOD Plod, arrest that Prince I say!

Let's see who else I can get arrested...


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 73 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 8  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group