Re: NATSS Single Body. £3/4M Sport England money. What happe
Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 8:04 pm
Or go back a little further to Bentham - "it is the greatest happiness of the greatest number that is the measure of right and wrong"
Depending on your point of view this could mean:
One umbrella organisation to support all shooters but probably with a huge complexity and compromise. How would you ever reach consensus. Would it frighten or please society and the law makers? Weaken or strengthen shooters' lobby?
Several organisations to support each type of shooter in the best way for their discipline.
Ban all shooters if that makes the majority of society happy.
What do shooters want to achieve? What would society want? How do you best resolve any conflicts between the 2?
Depending on your point of view this could mean:
One umbrella organisation to support all shooters but probably with a huge complexity and compromise. How would you ever reach consensus. Would it frighten or please society and the law makers? Weaken or strengthen shooters' lobby?
Several organisations to support each type of shooter in the best way for their discipline.
Ban all shooters if that makes the majority of society happy.
What do shooters want to achieve? What would society want? How do you best resolve any conflicts between the 2?