Re: Ban on Civilian use of SARTS?
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 2:51 pm
*hired being the key word.
That is correct. It costs £29.71per hour for an operative to operate the sytem plus £36 per lane. Plus vat. So not a cheap day out if you are there all day.Yamavira wrote:As stated earlier. Civilian clubs have never been allowed to operate SARTS systems on the Catterick ranges. Furthermore should a Landmarc qualified Range person be a member of a civilian rifle club he/she is NOT allowed to operate the system on a club range day. ANOTHER qualified Range person must be hired to operate the system.
When booking a range on the Catterick complex using the newly introduced BAMS system one must now state on an attached Email what type of targetry will be used . A copy of the club's RASP must also be attached (Maj. Fox instruction).
yamavira.
Field firing ranges usually refers to the safety template R (allowing wider arcs than usual as required for live fire an manouver without fixed firing points etc). Given the silliness we used to get up to in Sennybridge or Warminster this is a bloody good thingsnayperskaya wrote:I thought civilian clubs were stopped from using MOD field-fire ranges?
Or lack of skill, which is why I binned the ACF PDQ. Some very good bods but very few (I have to be honest I doubt my area was representative, least I hope not).Sim G wrote:There certainly seems to be more and more instances where the supervisors and managers of military ranges are going out of their way to make life difficult. There is a SNCO on the mil ranges we use who reminds me perfectly why I chose not to stay in the army.
Time and time again the lack of a properly fostered civilian marksmanship ethos has been proven to weaken British military effectiveness in actual conflict. Skills and equipment developed in civilian sports transfer to the military arena seemlessly. Just read Gen. Wheeler’s submission to the Cullen Enquiry. Some of those within the MoD and their partner agencies could do with being reminded of this...
I wonder if there is a case to be made that conscription should be illegal, or that basic training must be longer, as we are forbidden to train in civilian life. Isn’t it infringing the recruits’ human rights? If the cost of the armed forces went up because of the firearms restrictions the restrictions might be lessened or at least not increased. We are dealing with people that know the cost of everything and the value of nothing. [WINKING FACE]Time and time again the lack of a properly fostered civilian marksmanship ethos has been proven to weaken British military effectiveness in actual conflict. Skills and equipment developed in civilian sports transfer to the military arena seemlessly. Just read Gen. Wheeler’s submission to the Cullen Enquiry. Some of those within the MoD and their partner agencies could do with being reminded of this...