Page 2 of 2
Re: F class target dimension for the Imperial
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 5:07 pm
by HeatherW762
Have you got the old & new round the wrong way or is my headache worse than I thought? Weren't the short range targets getting slightly bigger not smaller? :G
Heather
Re: F class target dimension for the Imperial
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 5:20 pm
by Ovenpaa
I remember Mik saying the new Short range F Class were going to be smaller for last year. Are they getting bigger again?
Re: F class target dimension for the Imperial
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 5:26 pm
by John25
I just made a pdf out of the exel spreadsheet which Mik sent me.
To quote him in an earlier email
"The 4,3,and 2 rings have been made bigger for all the (word omitted) shooters"
For any word omitted - think manure
Are the 'old' one on the list the 'old,old' ie before 2010, I haven't got a bible here to check?
Re: F class target dimension for the Imperial
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 5:31 pm
by Quarters
Hi,
Thanks for all your responses.
Re: F class target dimension for the Imperial
Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 9:42 am
by desparado
"The 4,3,and 2 rings have been made bigger for all the (word omitted) shooters"
Mik is correct.
The 4,3 & 2 rings were made too narrow last year and have now been corrected.
The 2012 Bisley Bible now shows the correct dimensions - see the post by 'Ovenpaa'.
Cheers,