Tippmann Arms M4-22

All things rimfire including target, benchrest, hunters, semi autos and plinkers.

Moderator: dromia

Message
Author
walesdave
Posts: 489
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2011 8:42 pm
Contact:

Tippmann Arms M4-22

#1 Post by walesdave »

Hi All,
Thinking of getting a Tippmann Arms M4-22, the short UK model.
Advice / reviews from any owners?
Don't want to be rude, but I'm not after advice, hints or tips about other .22 M4 'clones'.
Cheers
David
strangesam

Re: Tippmann Arms M4-22

#2 Post by strangesam »

I too am interested to know about these from owners, especially w.r.t reliability (getting a lot of light strikes on my 15-22) and was thinking of possibly swapping, now that they have 25rnd magazines.
Nelly2014
Posts: 411
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2015 8:14 pm
Home club or Range: WNSC, UKPSA, SDC, MYOB
Contact:

Re: Tippmann Arms M4-22

#3 Post by Nelly2014 »

strangesam wrote:I too am interested to know about these from owners, especially w.r.t reliability (getting a lot of light strikes on my 15-22) and was thinking of possibly swapping, now that they have 25rnd magazines.
Re light strikes. Have you fitted an aftermarket trigger?
Hunter87

Re: Tippmann Arms M4-22

#4 Post by Hunter87 »

Tippmann also make paintball guns too lol
User avatar
BamBam
Posts: 2695
Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2013 5:23 pm
Location: Royston vasey
Contact:

Re: Tippmann Arms M4-22

#5 Post by BamBam »

It's cast aluminium rifle, so not up to milpsec strength of construction. They added an extra web inside the lower to beef it up.
Any AR triggers fits, but not the safety or the charging handle.
Questioned why they went with a plastic handguard on the short model, no answer.
It also chafes that this is a $550 rifle at retail and nearly £1000 here.
Image
User avatar
safetyfirst
Posts: 2651
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2014 8:41 am
Contact:

Re: Tippmann Arms M4-22

#6 Post by safetyfirst »

For that money surely a Lantac or spikes is a better bet? For less money a smith will shoot better. It’s occupying a strange middle ground.
MistAgain
Posts: 729
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2016 7:12 am
Contact:

Re: Tippmann Arms M4-22

#7 Post by MistAgain »

BamBam wrote:It's cast aluminium rifle, so not up to milpsec strength of construction. They added an extra web inside the lower to beef it up.
For gods sake ...........its a .22lr . it dont need milspec strength .

As for being cast and not machined , thats irrelevant . Machining is only as good as the material that the barstock or ingot is made from .

And Rugers have been using casting for years with no problems .
User avatar
Blackstuff
Full-Bore UK Supporter
Posts: 7794
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 1:01 pm
Contact:

Re: Tippmann Arms M4-22

#8 Post by Blackstuff »

True but i means that adding a fullbore upper might not be an option
DVC
MistAgain
Posts: 729
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2016 7:12 am
Contact:

Re: Tippmann Arms M4-22

#9 Post by MistAgain »

Blackstuff wrote:True but i means that adding a fullbore upper might not be an option
You almost have a valid point .

But how many people buying a 22 M4 want to put a full bore upper on at a later stage ? . Maybe a dozen or so a year .

How many people just want a 22lr M4 type that works well and looks good ? 50 ? 100 ? Maybe more ?

The more options we have , the better .
User avatar
Blackstuff
Full-Bore UK Supporter
Posts: 7794
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 1:01 pm
Contact:

Re: Tippmann Arms M4-22

#10 Post by Blackstuff »

If i was paying that kind of money to lug about a metal .22 i'd want it to be as versatile as possible, even if i had no intention of adding a fullbore lower at a later date (adds to resale value).
DVC
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest