Tippmann Arms M4-22
Moderator: dromia
Tippmann Arms M4-22
Hi All,
Thinking of getting a Tippmann Arms M4-22, the short UK model.
Advice / reviews from any owners?
Don't want to be rude, but I'm not after advice, hints or tips about other .22 M4 'clones'.
Cheers
David
Thinking of getting a Tippmann Arms M4-22, the short UK model.
Advice / reviews from any owners?
Don't want to be rude, but I'm not after advice, hints or tips about other .22 M4 'clones'.
Cheers
David
Re: Tippmann Arms M4-22
I too am interested to know about these from owners, especially w.r.t reliability (getting a lot of light strikes on my 15-22) and was thinking of possibly swapping, now that they have 25rnd magazines.
-
- Posts: 411
- Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2015 8:14 pm
- Home club or Range: WNSC, UKPSA, SDC, MYOB
- Contact:
Re: Tippmann Arms M4-22
Re light strikes. Have you fitted an aftermarket trigger?strangesam wrote:I too am interested to know about these from owners, especially w.r.t reliability (getting a lot of light strikes on my 15-22) and was thinking of possibly swapping, now that they have 25rnd magazines.
Re: Tippmann Arms M4-22
It's cast aluminium rifle, so not up to milpsec strength of construction. They added an extra web inside the lower to beef it up.
Any AR triggers fits, but not the safety or the charging handle.
Questioned why they went with a plastic handguard on the short model, no answer.
It also chafes that this is a $550 rifle at retail and nearly £1000 here.
Any AR triggers fits, but not the safety or the charging handle.
Questioned why they went with a plastic handguard on the short model, no answer.
It also chafes that this is a $550 rifle at retail and nearly £1000 here.
- safetyfirst
- Posts: 2651
- Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2014 8:41 am
- Contact:
Re: Tippmann Arms M4-22
For that money surely a Lantac or spikes is a better bet? For less money a smith will shoot better. It’s occupying a strange middle ground.
Re: Tippmann Arms M4-22
For gods sake ...........its a .22lr . it dont need milspec strength .BamBam wrote:It's cast aluminium rifle, so not up to milpsec strength of construction. They added an extra web inside the lower to beef it up.
As for being cast and not machined , thats irrelevant . Machining is only as good as the material that the barstock or ingot is made from .
And Rugers have been using casting for years with no problems .
- Blackstuff
- Full-Bore UK Supporter
- Posts: 7794
- Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 1:01 pm
- Contact:
Re: Tippmann Arms M4-22
You almost have a valid point .Blackstuff wrote:True but i means that adding a fullbore upper might not be an option
But how many people buying a 22 M4 want to put a full bore upper on at a later stage ? . Maybe a dozen or so a year .
How many people just want a 22lr M4 type that works well and looks good ? 50 ? 100 ? Maybe more ?
The more options we have , the better .
- Blackstuff
- Full-Bore UK Supporter
- Posts: 7794
- Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 1:01 pm
- Contact:
Re: Tippmann Arms M4-22
If i was paying that kind of money to lug about a metal .22 i'd want it to be as versatile as possible, even if i had no intention of adding a fullbore lower at a later date (adds to resale value).
DVC
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest